Highlights:
– The reported discussions between President Trump and Kevin Warsh regarding the replacement of Fed Chair Jerome Powell raised significant concerns about the independence of the Federal Reserve and potential market instability, emphasizing the crucial role the Federal Reserve plays in stabilizing the U.S. economy.
– The legal ambiguities surrounding the President's authority to remove the Fed Chair highlight the delicate balance between political influence and the Federal Reserve's independence, indicating the complexities involved in ensuring economic stability through monetary policy adjustments.
– Kevin Warsh's potential appointment as Fed Chair, known for his economic policy approach and market communication expertise, introduces the notion of careful governance navigation within the Federal Reserve System, underscoring the importance of maintaining independence from political interference for effective economic policy execution.
Summary
This article explores reported discussions that occurred between former U.S. President Donald Trump and former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh about the potential replacement of then Fed Chair, Jerome Powell. These discussions drew significant attention due to the traditionally independent nature of the Federal Reserve, which serves to stabilize the U.S. economy, primarily through monetary policy adjustments. President Trump’s reported contemplation of such a move is considered notable due to its potential impact on economic outcomes and the stability of financial markets.
The subject of these discussions, Jerome Powell, was appointed Fed Chair by Trump during his first term. His potential removal from the position was considered controversial due to legal ambiguities surrounding the President’s authority to remove the Fed Chair. The precedent set by Humphrey’s Executor v. United States case in 1935 interprets the Federal Reserve Act to mean that Federal Reserve governors can only be removed by the President for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office”.
These reports of Trump’s discussions with Warsh raised concerns about potential threats to the Federal Reserve’s independence and the subsequent market instability that could ensue. Any attempt by Trump to remove Powell could potentially result in a legal challenge that reaches the Supreme Court. Despite these controversies, no final decision regarding Powell’s position was made during Trump’s term in office.
Kevin Warsh, the potential replacement for Powell discussed by Trump, is a former Federal Reserve governor known for his market communication expertise and economic policy approach. His potential appointment as Fed Chair would necessitate careful navigation of the Federal Reserve System’s established governance, which is designed to maintain independence from political interference.
Background Information
The Federal Reserve System is an independent government agency, with its principal components being the Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Washington and 12 regional Federal Reserve banks across the country. The Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, often referred to as the “Fed Chair,” is the active executive officer of the Board of Governors and is chosen by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to serve four-year terms. This role requires testifying before Congress on various financial issues and submitting an extensive report, known as the Monetary Policy Report, twice a year.
The Chairman also meets periodically with the Treasury Secretary, a member of the President’s Cabinet, and must certify under oath that they are not an officer or director of any bank, banking institution, trust company, or Federal Reserve bank or hold stock in any such entity.
Maintaining the independence of the Federal Reserve from political influence is considered crucial for economic outcomes, as demonstrated by global experiences and extensive economic research. The Federal Reserve’s role is to achieve maximum employment and price stability for the benefit of all Americans, outside of political considerations.
The subject of this article is the reported discussions President Donald Trump has had with former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh about potentially replacing the then Fed Chair, Jerome Powell. Despite appointing Powell during his first term, Trump had a contentious relationship with him. It was reported that Trump spoke with Warsh about this possibility as recently as February, and the topic continued to be raised into March. However, no final decision had been made.
History of Presidential Attempts to Remove Federal Reserve Chairs
The Federal Reserve Act states that Federal Reserve governors can only be removed by the President “for cause”. This has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in a 1935 case, Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, as meaning removal only in instances of “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office”. This ruling was made in response to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s attempt to remove a member of the Federal Trade Commission due to policy disagreements.
Presidential attempts to influence or remove Federal Reserve Chairs have been met with legal challenges and market instability. For instance, a move by President Trump to consider removing Fed Chair Jerome Powell was met with resistance, as it was considered legally questionable. An opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in 2019 stated that Reserve Bank presidents are “inferior officers” under the constitution and therefore subject to “plenary removal” by the Fed Board of Governors. However, this opinion has never been tested in litigation and no Reserve Bank president has ever been removed by the Board.
Report on President Trump’s Alleged Discussion with Kevin Warsh
Reports suggest that President Trump had multiple discussions with former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh about potentially replacing Jerome Powell as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. These discussions reportedly took place at Trump’s private club, Mar-a-Lago in Florida, with the most recent conversation occurring in February.
President Trump has consistently criticized Powell, urging him to lower interest rates, a call which Powell has refused. Trump has not made a final decision on whether to attempt to remove Powell from his position, a move that could potentially lead to a Supreme Court challenge.
In the midst of these reports, Powell reiterated the Federal Reserve’s independence at an event at the Economic Club of Chicago, assuring his commitment to set interest rates independent of political pressure or partisan considerations. Allies of the White House viewed Trump’s discussions with Warsh less as a direct attempt to oust Powell, and more as an attempt to position him as a future scapegoat for the country’s economic woes.
Potential Consequences of Removing Powell
Any attempt to remove Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, as reportedly contemplated by Donald Trump, could potentially result in market instability due to the ensuing uncertainty. The legal ability of the President to remove the chairman of the Federal Reserve is unclear, as there is no specific statute detailing such a process.
Central banks, including the Federal Reserve, need to remain agile and credible, especially in the face of weakening global outlooks such as those influenced by Trump’s tariff policies. Any sudden threat to the independence of the Federal Reserve could intensify market stress and possibly shift it towards stagflationary trends, as suggested by Evercore ISI Vice Chair Krishna Guha.
Speculation on Potential Replacement by Kevin Warsh
As President Trump reportedly contemplated replacing Jerome Powell, former governor of the U.S. Federal Reserve, Kevin Warsh emerged as a top candidate. Warsh served as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from February 24, 2006, until his resignation on March 31, 2011. His profile, including his time as a distinguished visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution and his background in public policy, with a focus on economics and statistics, make him a qualified contender for the role.
Warsh’s potential appointment as the new governor may signal a shift in the Federal Reserve’s policy approach. Observers believe Warsh’s appointment would “represent more of a break with the Bernanke/Yellen era and would seek to style himself more on the (Alan) Greenspan model,” implying a shift towards tighter policy and less intervention. Furthermore, Warsh’s expertise in market communication suggests that the president-elect may prioritize appointing a governor who can effectively communicate with the market.
The role of the chairman of the Federal Reserve, as stipulated by law, includes presiding over Board meetings and guiding the Board’s responsibilities, which encompass analysis of domestic and international financial and economic developments. The chairman also supervises and regulates the Federal Reserve Banks, exercises responsibility in the nation’s payments system, and administers consumer credit protection laws. Warsh, if chosen, would be expected to assume these duties and responsibilities.
The content is provided by Harper Eastwood, Scopewires
